Law & Compliance · 2026-10-04 · 12 min read
EU Digital Omnibus: what the simplification package changes in the AI Act, who gains relief as a small mid-cap and why waiting is still risky

Michael Kaiser
Co-Founder & Head of Systems, Vincency
The short answer first: the Digital Omnibus would change two things that matter for mid-market companies. The AI Act’s high-risk obligations would no longer start on fixed calendar dates but once the Commission confirms that harmonised standards and support tools exist, within a frame of at most 16 months. And the reliefs that today only SMEs enjoy would be extended to companies with up to 750 employees. Everything already in force stays untouched: the bans on unacceptable AI practices and the duties for general-purpose models apply regardless of what happens to the proposal.
This piece is written for the managing director who read about Brussels easing AI rules and now wonders whether the compliance project can be shelved. The honest answer is no, and the details explain why.
What the proposal actually does
On 19 November 2025 the Commission tabled COM(2025) 836 final, a regulation amending the AI Act to simplify its implementation. The official reasoning is practical: harmonised standards, guidance and compliance tools were arriving slower than the fixed application dates of 2 August 2026 and 2 August 2027, so companies would face obligations without the instruments to meet them. The proposal therefore couples the start of the high-risk rules to the availability of those instruments and caps the transition at 16 months.
| Element | Current AI Act | If the omnibus passes |
|---|---|---|
| High-risk start date | Fixed: 2 Aug 2026 / 2 Aug 2027 | Starts when the Commission confirms standards exist, max. 16 months |
| Simplified documentation | SMEs only | SMEs plus small mid-caps below 750 employees |
| Penalty consideration | SME status weighed under Art. 99 | SMC status weighed as well |
| Bans and GPAI duties | Already applicable | Unchanged. Not part of the simplification. |
| Incident reporting | Separate channels per law | Single entry point for cybersecurity incidents |
The new size class that decides who wins
The more structural change sits in the size categories. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1099 of 21 May 2025 created a new tier: small mid-cap enterprises are companies that have outgrown the SME definition, employ fewer than 750 people and stay below 150 million euros in annual turnover or 129 million euros in balance sheet total. The Commission counts roughly 38,000 of them in the EU. Until now the moment a company passed 250 employees it fell off a cliff into the full large-enterprise regime. The omnibus uses the new category to carry SME privileges upward: simplified technical documentation, a quality management system proportionate to size under Article 17, softer penalty assessment under Article 99 and priority guidance from national authorities.
For the German Mittelstand this is the concrete question worth checking: companies between 250 and 749 employees sit exactly in this band. They would gain the lighter compliance path precisely where the classic Mittelstand grows out of the small-enterprise bracket, which is where most of our readers’ organisations live.
The wider package beyond the AI Act
The AI omnibus is one part of a broader digital package the Commission presented the same day, summarised in its official press release. For operations the most relevant piece is a single entry point for cybersecurity incident reporting: today the same incident can trigger duties under NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act and GDPR at once, a burden we documented in our pieces on the NIS2 reporting deadlines and the CRA duty that is live since September 2026. The package also touches GDPR in targeted ways, modernises cookie rules toward browser-level consent, proposes European Business Wallets and a Data Union strategy. The Commission estimates the simplifications could save five billion euros in administrative costs by 2029.
The honest risk calculation
Three qualifications keep this sober. First, the omnibus is a proposal: Parliament and Council hold it since November 2025 and can amend or reject it; if it fails, the August dates stand. Second, relief is not exemption: SMCs keep the same obligations, they just fulfil them with less paperwork. Third, the parts already in force were never touched, so a company that paused its AI inventory work on headline news has gained nothing. The practical stance is the same one we take in the AI Act deployer obligations guide: map which systems qualify, prepare the documentation path, and treat any delay as borrowed time rather than abolished duty.
Whoever takes one sentence from this piece: the Digital Omnibus would stretch the clock and lower the paperwork burden for most Mittelstand companies, but it changes the calendar, not the destination.
Related service
IT strategy as a guided service
The analysis described here can be done in house. If you lack the time or the distance from your own systems, we take it on: inventory, a prioritised order and, if you wish, the implementation.
IT strategy consultingFrequently asked questions about the Digital Omnibus
What is the EU Digital Omnibus exactly?
A legislative proposal by the Commission dated 19 November 2025, officially COM(2025) 836 final. It amends the AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, in two targeted ways: the start of the high-risk obligations would be linked to the availability of the required standards and support tools, and the reliefs currently reserved for SMEs would be extended to small mid-cap enterprises. It sits inside a wider digital package with targeted GDPR adjustments, cookie modernisation and a single entry point for incident reporting.
Does the omnibus postpone the AI Act deadlines of August 2026?
That is the core of the proposal. Instead of the fixed dates of 2 August 2026 and 2 August 2027, the high-risk rules would start applying once the Commission has confirmed that the necessary harmonised standards and support measures exist, within a frame of at most 16 months. Important: this is a proposal, not law. Until Parliament and Council agree, the AI Act calendar dates stand unchanged.
What is a small mid-cap and does my company qualify?
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1099 defines small mid-cap enterprises as companies that no longer count as SMEs under Recommendation 2003/361/EC, employ fewer than 750 people and have an annual turnover not exceeding 150 million euros or a balance sheet total not exceeding 129 million euros. There are around 38,000 such companies in the EU. Anyone between 250 and 749 employees falls under the stricter large-enterprise rules today; the omnibus would grant them SME privileges.
Which reliefs would small mid-caps get concretely?
According to the proposal text, four main ones: simplified technical documentation, a quality management system proportionate to company size under Article 17, lighter consideration when penalties are set under Article 99 and priority guidance from national authorities. The obligations themselves remain; what drops is the formal effort of meeting them.
Can I stop my AI Act project now?
Risky. The omnibus is a proposal inside the legislative process; the text can still change or fail before adoption. If it fails, the original timeline applies. Second, it only touches the high-risk parts not yet in force: the bans on unacceptable AI practices and the duties for general-purpose AI models already apply. Anyone operating or introducing high-risk systems today should keep planning and at most adjust the prioritisation.
Sources, status and note: All facts were read at primary sources, retrieved on 4 October 2026: the legislative proposal COM(2025) 836 final for the AI Act amendments, the standards linkage and the SME to SMC extensions; Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1099 for the small mid-cap definition of fewer than 750 employees and the financial ceilings; and the Commission press release for the wider digital package, the single incident reporting entry point and the savings estimates. The proposal is not yet law; Parliament and Council can still change it.
Related insights